England · Waves · WA-U3

WA-11 · Infrared surfaces investigation

Planned lecture content and an original worked practice example. Read the scope labels before using Higher or separate-Physics branches.

Status

Lecture detail

WA-11 · WA-U3 · Planned

Infrared surfaces investigation

  • ScopeShared
  • Difficulty3 / 4 · proposed
  • Time35–40 min · estimated
  • StatusPlanned

Learning objectives

Plan comparisons of absorption/emission for different surfaces; control geometry and temperature.

8463 §§4.6.2.2;8.2.10 / 8464 §§6.6.2.2;10.2.21

DfE single-science pp.37–39 / Combined pp.32–33. Evidence checked 30 September–1 October 2026. Skills: WS2.1–2.7,3.4,3.7; MS2b,2c,4c.

Needs firstEN-09,WA-08

Explanation

A surface comparison needs equal geometry, distance and relevant starting temperatures. Good infrared absorbers are also good emitters. Compare like measurements and state whether the detector measures radiation directly or whether temperature change provides indirect evidence.

Concepts, equations and units: Infrared transfer; temperature °C, time s, detector signal in labelled units; dark matt versus light shiny surfaces; no Stefan–Boltzmann equation.

Prediction, demonstration and game exercise

Predict, observe, explain

Compare model detector readings from equally hot surfaces and warming rates under equal irradiation.

Planned learner game exercise

Select detector distance, initial temperature, surface finish and repeats; collect both absorption/emission evidence.

Independent practice

Plot results with uncertainty; distinguish temperature readings from direct radiation measurements.

Original practice example · Shared

Equally hot surfaces at the same distance give repeated detector signals: matt A = 18, 19, 20; shiny B = 6, 7, 8 arbitrary units. Compare means.

Show working and model answer

Working / reasoning

Mean A = 57/3 = 19; mean B = 21/3 = 7. A’s emitted detector signal is larger under the stated controls.

Answer

19 and 7 units; A emits a larger measured IR signal in this setup.

Exit check and success criteria

Controlled comparison with labelled data and a conclusion limited to the tested surfaces.

During practice, compare the prediction with evidence and give an error-specific prompt. The exit item uses a fresh context or fresh values, answered independently.

Misconceptions, practical links and mastery

Check these misconceptions

Black surfaces only absorb and never emit; visible colour alone determines every radiation property.

Practical preparation

RP-P10/RP-C21; AT1,4.

Virtual preparation and revision only. Required hands-on activities and school records remain separate.

Proposed mastery

0: not yet evidenced. 1: supported. 2: independent exit criteria met. 3: successful changed-context transfer. Advance at 2; revisit with fresh retrieval. These are not GCSE grades.

Unit assessment

Continue through the unit

Sources and full programme

Sources checked 30 September–1 October 2026. Specifications govern content; textbooks supplement it. England has no single prescribed Physics course book. The full planning document includes sourced comparisons of Collins separate Physics and Trilogy books, Hodder/Hachette Physics and Oxford Physics listings, with access/approval limitations.

Download the complete Markdown programme and coverage matrix

A subsection map is proposed coverage. Clause-level educator review, item moderation, model validation and hands-on provision remain release gates. No all-board alignment or exam-board endorsement is claimed.